Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 04:07
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
PS5's Brilliant New State of Play Breaks Records for Sony - Push Square
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Is there electric light therapy tested and proven science?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supreme Court lets DOGE access Social Security data of millions of Americans - The Washington Post
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Scoop: Treasury officials defend "revenge tax" from wary GOP senators - Axios
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Inflation Expectations Decline; Labor Market Expectations Improve - Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.